China ready to annex Taiwan by 'any means possible'
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
The three-way strategic defence agreement between the UK, USA and Australia will see nuclear-powered submarines deployed in the Indo-Pacific area, as well as heightened shared surveillance between the three countries to counteract China’s operations in the area. The deal has scuppered a pre-existing agreement with French manufacturers to produce diesel-powered submarines, causing outrage in political circles in the country.
The deal has also angered those on the other side of the world.
Anti-nuclear groups in Australia have expressed frustration over how the submarines could be used as a ’Trojan horse’ for nuclear power being used by the nation.
Australia has a long history of opposing the use of nuclear energy.
Australia has huge reserves of uranium, used in the proliferation of nuclear-powered objects.
READ MORE: EU left ‘furious’ as France lose BILLIONS over sunk submarine deal
There were strong protests in the country in the 1970s due to risks to public health, particularly for those living near proposed facilities.
The safety of mining and storing nuclear power is also a major cause of concern.
Disasters such as Chernobyl and Fukushima have put the brakes on the development of the nuclear power industry, as the fallout from those disasters is still present in Ukraine and Japan respectively.
Australia currently mines uranium even though nuclear power is seldom used in the country – but it still exports to other parts of the world.
When announcing the new deal, Morrison said Australia was not seeking to develop “civil nuclear capability,” which would include nuclear power plants.
But opposition Green Party have said that Australia would run the risk of becoming less safe if it has “floating Chernobyls in the heart of Australia’s cities.”
Elsewhere, New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has reportedly spoken directly to her Australian counterpart Scott Morrison, informing him that nuclear vessels will not be welcome in NZ’s waters.
Australia’s neighbours have been a no-nuclear zone since 1984.
Will China invade Taiwan? Western soldiers will ”waste their lives’ [INSIGHT]
Germany election polls: SPD accused of ‘hiding’ left wing co-leader [REPORT]
WAR fears as Boris ‘rules nothing out’ after new alliance [INSIGHT]
New Zealand’s anti-nuclear stance applies to nuclear power, nuclear-powered vessels, and nuclear weapons.
The country uses primarily hydroelectric energy, and positive public opinion on the use of nuclear power in New Zealand is close to zero.
The move has naturally caused anger in China as well.
Chinese officials have reacted viciously to the announcement, saying the three countries had an “obsolete Cold War mentality.”
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the alliance risked “severely damaging regional peace… and intensifying the arms race”.
The news has also been met with criticism by Chinese state media, and has been labelled as “clear provocation” of Beijing and a “military threat”.
Source: Read Full Article