‘Extreme and illegal’ EU’s top court accused of concealing documents in brazen cover-up

Hans-Ueli Vogt RAGES against European Court of Human Rights

When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters.Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer.Our Privacy Notice explains more about how we use your data, and your rights.You can unsubscribe at any time.

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has been denying access to its files and decisions, sparking concerns about its stance on open justice and transparency. Journalists and layers have been denouncing the shocking move after they attempted to access documents relating to past judgment issued by the court.

The move has been branded by Law Professor at the University of Maribor, Slovenia, Jurij Toplak, as “extreme and illegal”.

The ECHR is Europe’s top court, covering 47 countries, including the UK, all 27 EU member states, and 19 other countries.

On the court’s official website a message reads: “Documents deposited with the Registrar are accessible to the public unless the President of the Court decides otherwise.

“Due to the Coronavirus COVID-19, file consultations are suspended until further notice.”

The date by which the decision to suspend consultation of files was made is unclear, but since March 10 those asking for copies of documents have received the above message and no further explanation.

Mr Toplak, who is also a visiting Professor at Fordham Law School, New York, said: “After allowing access to its single-judge decisions for decades and after sending applications out for several months, the Court’s termination of access in March 2021 due to the pandemic seems unjustified.

“The pandemic has not worsened in March 2021.

“No court should be allowed to hide its decisions from the public.

“The files are public documents.

“This means that the ECHR has to allow the public to see them.

“In no other circumstances in the past has the court suspended its services.

READ MORE: Brussels doesn’t think UK would ‘retaliate’ over export ban

“I believe there is something else at play.

“It may be a tendency to limit the transparency.

“But this move, however, is extreme. It is also illegal.

“The Convention makes it clear that the public should have access to files.

DON’T MISS:
Brexit LIVE: EU accuses UK of breaking promises – showdown looms
 [LIVE BLOG]
EU hatches plan to target UK’s jabs because we’re doing better
 [INSIGHT]
Brexit superwoman Liz Truss launches UK trade masterplan
 [ANALYSIS]

“Several political leaders worldwide have justified their dubious decisions with pandemic.

“I would have never expected that from the ECHR.”

Under Article 40 of the Convention of Human Rights, all documents deposited with the registrar of the ECHR must be accessible to the public unless the President of the Court decides otherwise according to just two exceptions, namely: documents composing the case file of the former Commission, and documents deposited with the Registry in connection with friendly-settlement negotiations.

A pandemic does not fall under the two exceptions provided by the law.

Source: Read Full Article