David Cameron admits fault over lobbying ministers for emergency loan

David Cameron is ‘entitled to earn a living’ says Charles Walker

When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters. Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer. Our Privacy Notice explains more about how we use your data, and your rights. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Breaking his weeks of silence, the former prime minister said in a statement that having “reflected on this at length” he accepts there are “important lessons to be learnt”. But Labour said his attempt to draw a line under the issue on Sunday leaves “many serious questions” unanswered, and demanded he addresses them before Parliament. The “scandal” surfaced when it emerged the Conservative privately lobbied ministers, including with texts to Chancellor Rishi Sunak, to win access to an emergency coronavirus loan scheme for his employer, the scandal-hit financier Lex Greensill.

The total number of ministers to be entangled in the controversy reached four when it was reported that Mr Cameron arranged a “private drink” between Health Secretary Matt Hancock and Mr Greensill to discuss a payment scheme later rolled out in the NHS.

Mr Cameron also emailed a senior Downing Street adviser pressing for a rethink on Mr Greensill’s application for access to emergency funding.

The former prime minister: “In my representations to Government, I was breaking no codes of conduct and no government rules.”

He said that “ultimately” the outcome of his efforts to get Greensill’s proposals included in the Government’s Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) was that “they were not taken up”.

“So, I complied with the rules and my interventions did not lead to a change in the Government’s approach to the CCFF,” he added.

“However, I have reflected on this at length. There are important lessons to be learnt. As a former prime minister, I accept that communications with government need to be done through only the most formal of channels, so there can be no room for misinterpretation.”

Questions had been mounting over his efforts to secure access for the finance company, which later collapsed, putting thousands of UK steelmaking jobs at risk.

Mr Cameron said that “many of the allegations” made in recent weeks “are not correct” as he challenged what he said is was a “false impression” that Mr Greensill was a key member of his team while in No 10.

In the 1,749-word statement, Mr Cameron insisted Mr Greensill was “not a political appointee” and had been brought in by the late cabinet secretary Lord Heywood.

“The truth is, I had very little to do with Lex Greensill at this stage – as I recall, I met him twice at most in the entirety of my time as prime minister,” Mr Cameron said.

A business card from Mr Greensill saw him titled as a “senior adviser, Prime Minister’s office” and was complete with a personal No 10 email address.

Mr Cameron also argued that his remuneration in shares for Greensill were “nowhere near the amount speculated in the press” after their worth was suggested to be in the dozens of millions.

Mr Cameron sought to defend the use of his profile as a former prime minister to lobby his successors in government on behalf of Greensill, which hired him as an adviser in August 2018.

“I thought it was right for me to make representations on behalf of a company involved in financing a large number of UK firms. This was at a time of crisis for the UK economy, where everyone was looking for efficient ways to get money to businesses,” Mr Cameron argued.

Mr Cameron also issued a defence of meeting Mohammed bin Salman during a business trip in January 2020, more than a year after the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in October 2018.

As early as the month of the murder, MI6 chief Sir John Sawers said “all the evidence” suggested the prince’s critic had been murdered on the orders of someone close to him.

“While in Saudi Arabia, I took the opportunity to raise concerns about human rights, as I always did when meeting the Saudi leadership when I was prime minister,” Mr Cameron said.

He was prime minister between 2010 and 2016 before being hired as an adviser by Greensill in August 2018. Mr Greensill was a Government adviser on finance during Mr Cameron’s time in No 10.

This week, it emerged the Chancellor responded to the numerous private texts from Mr Cameron by saying on April 23 last year that he had “pushed” officials to consider plans that could have helped Greensill.

Mr Cameron also described the decision to exclude his employer’s firm, Greensill Capital, from the multibillion-pound scheme as “nuts” in an email to a senior adviser to Prime Minister Boris Johnson and pressed for the Chancellor to reconsider.

“What we need is for Rishi (Sunak) to have a good look at this and ask officials to find a way of making it work,” Mr Cameron emailed on April 3 last year.

Labour called for Mr Sunak to “come out of hiding” and make a statement to Parliament about the “growing scandal”, and reiterated demands for an investigation.

As Mr Cameron pointed out, the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists cleared him of breaking lobbying rules because as an employee of Greensill he was not required to declare himself on the register.

But the issue has led to calls for an overhaul of lobbying rules.

Labour’s shadow chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Rachel Reeves said: “Many serious questions remain unanswered, and it is crucial that the former prime minister appears before Parliament so that all the information is brought to light.

“Transparency and accountability are crucial and that requires the utmost openness from government to establish the full facts behind this scandal.”

Former prime minister Gordon Brown said that tougher rules could be needed to prevent former prime ministers and ministers lobbying within Government, amid the David Cameron Greensill row.

“I can’t comment on the individual detail of this, but for me there are principles about public service – it cannot ever become a platform for private gain,” Mr Brown told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

“Ministers must never be lobbying, former ministers, prime ministers, must never be lobbying for commercial purposes. Current ministers should not be entertaining such lobbying.

“And if we can’t succeed in achieving this stopping by the sort of flexibility of the rules, we are going to have to pass laws to make sure that at least for say five years, no serving or former prime minister or minister, is ever lobbying for any commercial purpose within government.

“It simply brings public service into disrepute.”

Commons Liaison Committee chairman Sir Bernard Jenkin said that the David Cameron lobbying row had reflected a culture of “a very casual way of running governments”.

Asked about the former prime minister’s statement, the Conservative MP told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “Well, he is clearly feeling acutely embarrassed.

“And in some respects, he is reflecting a culture of a very casual way of running governments and running the country that didn’t start with David Cameron; ‘sofa government’ long pre-dated David Cameron.

“This very informal way of conducting relationships about very important matters and the distribution of public money, well I don’t think the public thinks that’s acceptable.

“But I am not going to pass judgment on David Cameron, I think in some respects it’s a distraction.

“What is more important is not who is lobbying, and even if you have a five-year ban as suggested by Gordon Brown, is it OK for an ex-prime minister to start lobbying after six years?

“You can’t make laws stretch far into the future to bind people to previous employment, it just doesn’t work.”

Commons Liaison Committee chairman Sir Bernard Jenkin called for a “better conversation” about lobbying amid the David Cameron row.

The Conservative MP told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “You can’t stop people from earning a living after they leave public life, but we can have a better conversation about this.

“But the conversation needs to happen in Government.

“We recommended changes to the ministerial code, and to the civil service code, that would recognise what kind of things might be going on when you are dealing with a contractor, when you are dealing with someone like Lex Greensill, while you are a minister or while you are an official.”

Source: Read Full Article