Boris Johnson wades into Meghan Markle court row – vows to ‘carefully study’ judgement

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

A spokesman for the Prime Minister said Mr Johnson supported a free press and would look at the judgement made by the Court of Appeal.

The court yesterday threw out an appeal by the Mail on Sunday against an earlier ruling that the newspaper infringed Meghan’s privacy and copyright by publishing parts of a letter she penned to her father Thomas Markle.

Written shortly after their wedding in 2018, the five-page letter detailed the breakdown of the relationship between the Duchess of Sussex and her father.

In its ruling, the court said the contents of the letter was “personal, private and not matters of legitimate public interest”.

However, critics have argued the decision will have a damaging impact on free speech.

Amid the row, the No10 official said the Prime Minister would look into the implications of the court’s findings.

They said: “We will study the implications of the judgement carefully.

“I think you’ve heard the Prime Minister say before, a free press is one of the cornerstones of any democracy.

“This Government recognises the vital role that newspapers and the media play in holding people to account and shining a light on the issues that matter to communities.”

He added: “You’ll be aware it’s still an ongoing legal case so I can’t go too much further.”

A spokesman for Associated Newspapers Limited, which owns the Mail on Sunday, has already said they are considering appealing the decision to take it to the Supreme Court.

They said the publication of the letter was “of public interest”.

There are fears the ruling will set a precedent for future court cases.

Last night, media lawyer Matthew Dando, a partner at the firm Wiggin LLP, warned the court’s judgement was “troubling” and would have “very serious consequences for freedom of expression”.

He added: “This decision heightens concerns that privacy laws permit public figures selectively to determine what can be reported about them and manipulate the media narrative.”

More to follow…

Source: Read Full Article